Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Magnetic stimulation, especially of specific regions of the brain, has added greatly to the understanding of normal brain function. It is also being increasingly used to stimulate nerves and the human brain for therapy. The writer and broadcaster Geoff Watts talked to Mike Polson, Engineering Director of Magstim Company Ltd, about the history and potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Model of a brain that shows areas where the direction of the neurons and the direction of the induced current are such that stimulation will occur – the more yellow andred the colour, the more intense the stimulation. Electric fields calculated on surface of grey matter by a 70 mm figure of eight coil centred on left motor cortex hand area© Professor Anthony T Barker
The development of non-invasive technologies has fundamentally changed the practice of modern medicine. From electrocardiograms to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, clinicians are acquiring an ever more complete understanding of what is happening inside the body without surgery having to open it, providing a significant aid in diagnosing a variety of diseases.
Therapies have also benefited from the advent of the non-invasive revolution. Externally applied energy in the form of ultrasound, electric or magnetic fields and various forms of radiation have all given rise to non-invasive methods of treatment. Now, magnetic stimulation of nerves and the brain is coming into clinical practice, having been used for years as a research tool. Used initially to diagnose and monitor of the progress of some neurological diseases, it has now found a role in treatment, notably of depression and migraine.
Observations on the interaction of electricity and living tissue go back to the experiments of Luigi Galvani in the late 1700s. He discovered that electrical stimulation of nerves using a rudimentary battery formed by a zinc and copper rod could cause muscles to contract. In the following century, Michael Faraday discovered that a time-varying magnetic field could generate electricity in conducting material – so called ‘electromagnetic induction’. However, it was not until the 1980s that researchers were able to develop technologies to allow these phenomena to be combined into the technique of magnetic stimulation, used to stimulate nerves and the human brain for therapy.
The reasons for this slow progress are a matter of speculation, but technical and cultural factors may both have played a part. Culturally, the standing of electricity and magnetism in therapy may have been constrained by the legacy of exaggerated and misguided Victorian beliefs in its alleged powers.
More prosaically, magnetic stimulation also had to wait for solutions to the practical engineering problems of developing the right lab equipment, and the vision to apply it to modern medical use.
The first stimulator with which TMS was demonstrated in February 1985. Left to right – Dr Reza Jalinous, Professor Ian Freeston and Professor Tony Barker
Nerves act as an information conduit and carry electrical signals around the body to enable many of its functions. In the 1970s, an NHS and Sheffield University engineer, Anthony Barker, was studying the range of speeds at which large nerve fibres conduct signals in a nerve bundle (typically 40–80 m/s), in the hope of developing a diagnostic tool for diseases such as multiple sclerosis in which nerve conduction velocity is impaired. This required the nerve in question to be artificially stimulated with an externally applied electrical current. The problem was that human tissues such as skin and bone have a high electrical resistance that makes it difficult, if not impossible, to stimulate the underlying nerves either non-invasively or painlessly – see HOW TMS WORKS
All cells in the body are surrounded by a membrane responsible for maintaining a difference in electrical potential between their interior and their surroundings. In a nerve cell, this potential difference is around -70 mV. A locally induced current, able to decrease this potential difference by a few millivolts somewhere along the length of the cell membrane, will initiate a wave of depolarisation that actively propagates along the length of the nerve fibre. This ‘action potential’ is what is commonly referred to as a nerve impulse.
An action potential can also be induced by inserting an electrode into, or near the nerve and stimulating it electrically, or by injecting current through the skin. The former is, of course, invasive and the latter causes discomfort by stimulating pain receptors in the skin. Faraday’s discovery pointed to a way of achieving the same end noninvasively and painlessly by inducing a current using an externally applied magnetic field.
The equipment required to generate suitable magnetic field pulses comprises a power source to charge a single, large capacitor that feeds a coil placed on the surface of the body above the nerves to be stimulated. Discharging the capacitor into the coil generates a pulse of magnetic field, which in turn sets up a current in the nerve, and initiates a nerve impulse. The original stimulators delivered single pulses, with a maximum repetition rate of about one pulse every five seconds. Today’s therapy devices can deliver up to 30 or more pulses per second and have a more complex circuit topography to enable energy from the initial pulse to be partly recaptured, decreasing the additional energy required to deliver the next pulse.
Less straightforward is the actual engineering needed to generate the required fields. The challenges stem largely from the size of the parameters involved. Depending on the coil type, peak magnetic fields of up to 4 Tesla are needed to induce the necessary currents in the tissue and this, in turn, requires peak currents in the coil of several thousand amps. In order to couple efficiently with the nerve membrane, a capacitor voltage of several thousand volts is needed to overcome the stimulating coil inductance and achieve a fast field risetime of around 100 µs.
BUILDING THE CAPACITORS AND COILS
Capacitors are not normally built for such a demanding use. Contacts between their plates are not generally designed to carry such high currents, and getting all the energy out so quickly is difficult. Rapid changes of voltage are stressful for the dielectric between their plates. Hence capacitors for use in magnetic stimulation equipment have to be designed and manufactured with these special requirements in mind.
A faulty capacitor is a potential hazard, and could lead to an uncontrolled, explosive high voltage energy release. So in the event of failure, the devices used in magnetic stimulation equipment are designed not to explode but rather to blow the terminals out of the end of the canister in which the capacitor components are packed.
This picture shows the patterns of induced electric field in a simple model of the head from a circular (left) and afigure of eight coil (right). The strength of the induced field is represented by colour: black being zero; cyan modestfields; red strong fields and dark red the maximum © Magstim
Most coils are built in the shape of a circle or a figure of eight. The typical circular coil comprises nine or so turns of thick enamelled copper wire, rectangular in cross section and induces current loops in the tissue that are approximately circular. Each time the system is fired, the windings attract one another. The forces involved can be of the order of 10,000 Newtons, which leads to relative movement between the windings, and to the clicking sound emitted by some instruments. One way of mitigating the effects of these movements is to cushion the winding. This can be done by using a thin layer of hot melt adhesive, a thermoplastic glue applied to the wires during the winding process.
The figure-of-eight configuration comprises two circular coils placed edge to edge and wired so that the currents in them rotate in opposite directions. Each coil induces circular current loops in the tissue but in opposite directions. The principle of superposition applies, making the induced currents in the centre of the configuration approximately twice those that occur elsewhere. This gives the figure of eight coil a degree of spatial ‘focality’, with stimulation most likely to occur at this midpoint.
Coils can be made in different sizes. The smaller the coil, the greater the spatial precision of the stimulus – but the fall off in magnetic field strength is more rapid, and so also is the induced current strength, with distance from the coil. A big coil will stimulate deeper structures but with poor spatial selectivity; a small coil will stimulate only superficial structures, but with a better focus.
A typical figure of eight coil used clinically, with winding mean diameters of 70 mm will have a range of approximately 30 x 20 mm where the induced field is high, and it is in this region that stimulation is most likely. This high field area exists from just under the coil, where it is greatest, to several centimetres down into the tissue, and there is uncertainty as to the exact site of stimulation in all three dimensions. Computer modelling is now being used extensively to aid in the evaluation of the delivered stimulus.
The current induced in tissue lying along the central axis of a circular coil is zero. Maximum stimulation occurs beneath the winding. When stimulating, say, a peripheral nerve in the arm, the operator places a circular coil on the skin in such a way that the nerve beneath aligns tangentially with the mean diameter of the overlying coil. The maximum induced current will then flow along its length, so giving the greatest likelihood of stimulation.
By choosing the voltage to which the capacitors are charged, the operator can vary the peak magnetic field generated by the stimulator. This gives control over the strength of the delivered stimulus and affects the number of nerves being stimulated, and also allows their excitability (that is, their sensitivity to being stimulated) to be assessed.
The need for deeper but safe stimulation has prompted research into new coil designs. One approach being investigated by a team led by Professor David Jiles FREng, first at Cardiff University then Iowa State University in the US, is termed the halo. The concept of the halo is to use a coil with a diameter large enough to encircle the patient’s whole head, used in conjunction with a smaller, conventional coil. The aim is to increase the effective depth of penetration of the stimulus by allowing more energy to be deposited into deeper parts of the brain.
The large coil aims to provide much of the magnetic flux density, but at a level insufficient to achieve stimulation. The smaller coil would then be used to lift the field above the stimulation threshold in the region of interest. Work so far has been limited to computer models and laboratory simulations. One study measured the magnitude of the magnetic field at various distances below a circular coil without and with a halo coil. The latter was found to boost the magnetic field by 10% at a distance of 20 mm below the circular coil, and 50% at 50 mm.
IN THE LAB AND CLINIC
Magnetic stimulation, especially of specific regions of the brain, has generated a large number of research studies, adding greatly to the understanding of normal brain function. Following the single paper by the Sheffield group in 1985 describing their successful demonstration of TMS, over 10,000 papers on the topic have been published since. Although the clinical use of TMS is comparatively limited, it is these applications that understandably garner the most intense interest.
One of the most firmly established is in monitoring the conduction velocity of motor nerves in conditions, notably multiple sclerosis, where this is compromised. Magnetic stimulation allows conduction speeds to be quantified, and the underlying physiological failures to be identified and characterised. Regular monitoring can contribute to patients’ quality of life by alerting their doctors to an impending relapse, and permitting a more timely intervention.
The best evidence of therapeutic benefit comes from using TMS to treat depression and migraine. TMS has been shown to either excite or suppress activity in the brain, depending on the frequency with which the stimuli are delivered and this can be used to beneficial effect. In comparison with the best known non-drug physical treatment for severe depression, electro-convulsive therapy (ECT), TMS is a benign therapy with virtually no side effects and which does not need the use of anaesthesia.
Although TMS was approved as a treatment for medication-resistant depression in Canada in 2002, the UK government’s National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence (NICE) has only recently issued guidance on its approved use. A set of guidance recommendations, published in December 2015 states that magnetic stimulation raises no major safety concerns, and adds that “The evidence on its efficacy in the short‑term is adequate, although the clinical response is variable. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression may be used with normal arrangements for clinical governance and audit.”
A magnetic stimulator coil is positioned on the head using a neuronavigation system which displays the actual coil location on an MRI image of the subject’s brain © Magstim
An even more recent application of TMS is in suppressing the symptoms of migraine. The treatment can be self-administered at home or work when needed, using a battery-powered portable stimulator the size of a small briefcase. In guidance published at the beginning of 2014, NICE offered qualified approval. While pointing out that some of the evidence remains contradictory, it suggested that the technique can be used in two ways: to treat or reduce the severity of the migraine when it starts; or, by regular use, to prevent or reduce the frequency of migraines occurring. It added that “TMS treatment may have a particular role in the reduction or avoidance of drug therapy, either where preferred or where contraindicated or best avoided (for example, in pregnancy).”
The number of disorders that can claim at least one study of the benefits of magnetic stimulation – many more in some cases – is already lengthy and still growing. As identified in a report on novel neurotechnologies issued by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, the list includes schizophrenia, Tourette’s syndrome, pain, addiction, epilepsy, memory loss, anxiety disorders, tinnitus, obsessive compulsive disorders, sleep, movement disorders (dystonia, Parkinson’s disease, ataxia) and stroke.
Some of these applications may fall by the wayside as further studies are completed; however, depression and migraine look set to become well-established applications and many others are being actively studied at present. It seems reasonable to expect that TMS will become an increasingly valuable therapeutic tool over the coming years.
Mike Polsonhas been active in the development of electro-medical devices since receiving his PhD at Sheffield in 1982. He has been Engineering Director at Magstim since 2013.
The author would like to thank Professor Anthony T Barker for his helpin compiling this article. Professor Barker is giving a lecture Magnetic stimulation of the brain at an Institute of Physics lecture held at the Open University, Milton Keynes on 13 April 2016
Keep up-to-date with Ingenia for freeSubscribe
Other content from Ingenia
- Environment & sustainability
A young engineer’s perspective on the good, the bad and the ugly of COP27
- Environment & sustainability
- Issue 95
How do we pay for net zero technologies?
- How I got here
Electrifying trains and STEMAZING outreach
- Civil & structural
- Environment & sustainability
- Issue 95