Launching low Earth orbit satellites from UK spaceports
Geostationary or low earth orbit?
🛰️ The locations and multiple uses of geostationary and low Earth orbit satellites
Geostationary orbit satellites travel at the same angular velocity as Earth, remaining fixed over the same location. They can only cover latitudes between +70 degrees and –70 degrees from the equator, but a single satellite can reach a third of the planet. They travel from west to east, at a speed of around three kilometres a second. These satellites are ideally suited for weather forecasting and radio and TV broadcasting. Because one satellite can cover such a large area, ground-based infrastructure is simpler and does not need to track the satellite.
A low Earth orbit satellite has an altitude of 1,000 kilometres or less – it could be as low as 160 kilometres above Earth. These satellites take approximately 90 minutes to circle the Earth. A constellation of low Earth orbit satellites can provide 24/7 coverage around the world. Because they are orbiting in a less harsh environment, the satellites themselves can be less robust.
The uses for these small satellites range from remote sensing and planetary observation through to insurance and communications. For instance, mobile phone networks are investigating the potential for launching low Earth orbit satellites to support 5G networks, augmenting terrestrial base station antennas and small cell units broadcasting over millimetre wave frequencies. Low Earth orbit is much better for data-streaming activities such as 5G and other two-way voice and data services, since they can transfer data much quicker than geostationary satellites, thanks to their lower orbit. Because 5G will power everything from autonomous vehicles to remotely operated surgical equipment, potential outages are unthinkable; satellites could provide an always-on backup to our terrestrial infrastructure. In the coming years, companies like Amazon, SpaceX and OneWeb are planning to launch mega-constellations featuring thousands of data-distributing small satellites.
Low Earth orbit satellites can be in polar orbit– where the satellite passes above, or nearly above, both poles of the Earth on each orbit, from north to south. The alternative is a Sun-synchronous orbit, a nearly polar orbit that ensures the satellite remains in-sync with the Sun as the planet moves, so the Earth is always illuminated by the Sun at the same angle from the satellite. For launching into polar and sun-synchronous orbits, the higher the latitude the better.
Next time you find yourself admiring the stars on a clear evening, take a moment to think about a manmade contribution to the skies above us. There are currently over 2,200 satellites orbiting the Earth, performing a variety of civil, commercial and state-level functions. However, rather than occupying a traditional geostationary orbit 36,000 kilometres above the equator, over two thirds of these satellites are in low Earth orbit, less than 2,000 kilometres above the Earth’s surface.
Despite occupying a far lower altitude, low Earth orbit satellites have traditionally been launched into space using rockets, just like their geostationary cousins. These inefficient vertical-lift propulsion devices burn immense amounts of energy attempting to escape Earth’s gravitational pull. For over 60 years, governments have been experimenting with alternatives to rocket-based satellite launches, and recent technological developments have heralded the arrival of the horizontal launch vehicle. So, how do horizontal launches work, and why are the spaceports they depart from being developed from Cornwall to the Shetland Islands?
The next generation of small satellites
Since 1957, when Sputnik I was successfully launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in what is now Kazakhstan, vertical take-off has been the only practical method of launch suitable for large satellites. However, recent advances in power and utility have resulted in smaller and lighter satellites. A small satellite is defined as one with a mass less than 500 kilograms, and almost three quarters of satellite launches planned for the next decade will be in this category. Some are the size of a shoebox, weighing as little as 25 kilograms, yet they’re often able to complete tasks that would have been the domain of geostationary satellites just 20 years ago.
As satellites have become smaller and lighter, the necessity for vertical launches has diminished, and horizontal launches have risen to prominence. While fuel volumes vary according to factors such as the weight of the payload, a vast amount of energy is expended accelerating vertically from standstill to 26,700 kilometres per hour (the minimum speed required for a satellite to enter a circular orbit 800 kilometres above Earth’s surface), while travelling through the five layers of our atmosphere. It’s long been accepted that high-altitude launches from the troposphere (11 kilometres up, or around 37,000 feet) require far less fuel to send a satellite into orbit. Indeed, air launch technology has already underpinned a number of pioneering inner-space projects, from the US Air Force’s X-15 to Orbital’s Pegasus rocket.
These horizontal take-offs can be carried out by existing high-altitude vehicles, such as a plane or a balloon. These have already done the hard work of escaping the densest part of Earth’s atmosphere and its strongest gravitational pull. An upper atmosphere launch location means that microsatellites can be launched into low Earth orbit comparatively affordably, potentially opening the market to smaller companies with limited funding.
The launch vehicle itself can be safely returned to Earth and reused, with no parts shed (or at risk of falling back to Earth). This distinguishes them from vertical take-off rockets, whose immense fuel canisters are discarded as they struggle to escape the planet’s gravitational pull. There’s also an added irony that this propellant and its storage canisters contribute most of the rocket’s weight on the launch pad. This further increases the four forces of flight acting on the launch vehicle (weight, lift, thrust and drag), all of which are negative factors in terms of everything from aerodynamics to fuel consumption.
A high-altitude launch also permits the use of efficient fuels that are banned from surface launches because of their relative toxicity. Stratospheric air launches aren’t impacted by the tropospheric weather that could otherwise cause delays, and there are no issues with noise when a rocket is launched from 10,600 metres in the air.
Across the UK, companies and entrepreneurs have been developing innovative ways of launching small satellites without having to build launch pads and achieve escape velocity, taking advantage of these benefits.
British satellite manufacturing
The UK has long punched above its weight in terms of satellite manufacturing. Today, one in eight satellites in the skies was manufactured in the UK. The space division of Airbus has facilities in Stevenage, while American-based Spire Global manufactures all its satellites at Glasgow’s fittingly-named Skypark. Remarkably, Glasgow builds more small satellites than any other city in Europe, with the space industry contributing almost £15 billion to the UK economy each year. Indeed, the UK Space Agency has set itself a target of boosting this to over £40 billion by 2030, which would comprise a 10th of the global space economy.
Yet while the UK leads the world in satellite manufacturing and data processing, it has never had a launch site capable of sending these delicate scientific objects into space. Vertical launch sites need to be located in vast, remote (and ideally equatorial) regions, and every launch was state-funded until the 1980s. The private sector has grown in stature since then, but the continuing reliance on vertical launches has seen Glasgow satellites being shipped thousands of miles at great expense to launch sites in locations such as India.
Spaceport Cornwall launch site
The UK is at the forefront of the world’s burgeoning horizontal launch sector. Spaceport Cornwall will be the UK’s first horizontal launch site, using modified passenger aircraft as the satellite launch vehicle. Its status was secured by factors including immediate access to the North Atlantic with no national borders to traverse, relatively uncongested airspace, and a suitably lengthy runway already in situ. Combining civilian flights with satellite launches is a world first for any airport, but one aeroplane is very similar to another, with comparable take-off and landing procedures. Cornwall has the geographical advantage of being on a peninsular in the Atlantic ocean, and rockets can be deployed at 10,600 metres at around 480 to 800 kilometres off the coast west or north of Ireland depending on the required trajectory. However, an airliner could also take off from Cornwall and travel to any desired location before discharging its payload into a designated orbit.
Spaceport Cornwall will use the existing 2.7 kilometre runway at Cornwall Airport Newquay to send a modified carrier aircraft from partner organisation Virgin Orbit up to a standard cruising altitude of 10,600 metres, with a payload stowed underneath the aircraft’s body. Then, the pilot will pull the aircraft up to a relatively sharp pitch angle to facilitate the release of a 16-metre two-stage rocket that houses the satellites. This will be dropped from under the aircraft wing – one of five air launch configurations known as ‘captive on bottom’. Alternatives include towed or internally-carried upper-stage air launch systems.
Virgin’s LauncherOne rocket will be capable of carrying a gross payload of 500 kilograms. Once this is dropped from the aircraft’s wing, the main stage engine will ignite, before detaching once its fuel is spent. The second stage will then ignite to complete its satellite payload’s journey into a low Earth polar or Sun-synchronous orbit. Once the payload has been successfully deployed, the carrier aircraft will return to the runway ready for its next mission. This will enable rapid creation or replenishment of satellite constellations, and it will be possible to schedule flights at just 24 hours’ notice.
While horizontal launches are not new, the dwindling size of satellites has meant that their delivery vehicles have also been able to shrink in size, cost and environmental footprint. Far less fuel is expended getting an aeroplane to 11,000 metres than a vertical launch rocket, and Virgin Orbit’s Cosmic Girl launch aircraft is a reconditioned passenger airliner (see ‘Who’s that girl’ box). The approximate cost of launching each satellite is around £10 million – a tiny amount compared to the cost of a vertical launch. With Cornwall acting as Virgin Orbit’s European operations hub, launches could be scheduled mere days in advance without disrupting existing air traffic.
Optimal location for balloon launches
Over 900 miles north of Spaceport Cornwall, on the island of Unst, another domestic spaceport is taking shape using more traditional aviation technology. Located at the very edge of the Shetland Isles, two kilometres from Britain’s most northerly house, the embryonic Shetland Space Centre offers a unique set of advantages as the location for low Earth orbit satellite launches from balloons. Direct flightpaths into polar and Sun-synchronous orbits do not pass over population centres or oil installations, and there is no interference from commercial airline traffic or military flights. In locations affected by one or more of these factors, dogleg launch trajectories are generally required – necessitating larger rockets and smaller payloads.
High latitude means that at the North Pole, satellites can be seen an unrivalled 16 times a day. Because Unst boasts the UK’s highest latitude, Shetland Space Centre’s comparable figure of 9.4 viewings per day is the best in the UK, making it an optimal location for downloading data from space. Unst has logistics infrastructure and supply chains already in place for the dwindling North Sea oil and gas industries, and after four decades of reliance on the oil and gas sector for jobs, Shetland boasts an established local workforce of talented engineers with transferable skills.
it is anticipated that 25 kilogram satellites the size of a toaster could be affordably launched from 100-metre-tall gas-filled balloons
Who's that girl?
🛫 Virgin’s involvement in satellite launches through Virgin Orbit
Virgin’s involvement in horizontal launches might seem curious, but as with many of its business ventures, the company identified an underserved customer community – something of a rarity in the aerospace community. A department within Virgin Galactic (the division focused on human spaceflight and space tourism) was spun off in 2017 to form Virgin Orbit, focusing exclusively on satellite launch services.
Virgin Orbit chose a Boeing 747–400 as its carrier aircraft because of its large carrying capacity, global supply chain and some unusual technical criteria. This aircraft was always designed to carry weight where the rocket is located – known variously as the fifth engine pod or fifth engine carry position. A programme of internal modifications was then undertaken, from stripping out extra weight on the passenger deck (such as seats, overhead bins and the galley) through to reinforcing the left wing where the rocket hangs. This simple yet ingenious conversion has already convinced the RAF to sign up to fly payloads on Cosmic Girl and its LauncherOne rocket, while other clients include OneWeb, ImageSat and Spaceflight
Companies like Lockheed Martin and ArianeGroup have already entered into partnerships with Shetland Space Centre (SCC). SSC is currently submitting a planning application to develop a 190-acre site across Lamba Ness and a former RAF airbase, incorporating everything from satellite assembly buildings to rocket fuelling facilities. In the meantime, SSC has hosted a test balloon launch by Bristol-based B2Space last summer. This successful trial demonstrated the viability of the Rockoon rocket launch technology, adapting a 1950s US Navy concept of conducting launches from a high-altitude balloon. Similar tests have already been conducted in the US’s Mojave Desert, and it is anticipated that 25 kilogram satellites the size of a toaster could be affordably launched from 100-metre-tall gas-filled balloons, slowly ascending to the stratosphere before discharging their payload into orbit.
A constant turnover of new satellites for long-term revenue
There is also a fringe benefit to the use of small satellites, which are intended to last a couple of years before falling out of orbit and burning up without leaving any space debris behind. Their shorter lifespans (compared to the 15 to 20 years of geostationary satellites) will necessitate a consistent turnover of new satellites being launched from facilities like Spaceport Cornwall and Shetland Space Centre. This cycle of regular replacement will provide long-term revenue streams for UK spaceports, supporting jobs and helping to maintain the UK’s position as a world leader in satellite design, manufacturing and launch.
This article has been adapted from "The final frontier", which originally appeared in the print edition of Ingenia 82 (March 2020).
Keep up-to-date with Ingenia for freeSubscribe
Can electrification solve aviation’s emissions problem?
A growing population and the efficiency and decreasing costs of air travel are leading to concerns about the aviation industry’s green credentials. As focus increases on creating a more sustainable planet for the future, the industry is looking to make changes. Paul Stein FREng, Chief Technology Officer at Rolls-Royce, sets out why the industry and policymakers should be looking at electrification to address such challenges.
Composites take off
When the Airbus A220 took to the air, it flew with the first certified commercial aircraft wing made using resin transfer infusion. The composite, carbon fibre wing is 10% lighter than a metal one, which reduces its environmental impact by consuming less fuel while flying and requiring less energy for its manufacture. These achievements won Bombardier the 50th anniversary MacRobert Award for engineering innovation.
Finding life on Mars
The UK has sent dozens of spacecraft to space, but has never successfully landed one on another planet. Tereza Pultarova spoke to UK engineers working on the European ExoMars rover about the technology that will enable some ground-breaking discoveries – including finding traces of what may have been life on Mars.
Global positioning system
The global positioning system (GPS) enables anyone with a smartphone or navigation units on cars to pinpoint their location or tell the time. Initially developed for military use, it now has applications ranging from aviation safety and banking to rescuing ships in distress.
Other content from Ingenia
- Environment & sustainability
A young engineer’s perspective on the good, the bad and the ugly of COP27
- Environment & sustainability
- Issue 95
How do we pay for net zero technologies?
- How I got here
Electrifying trains and STEMAZING outreach
- Civil & structural
- Environment & sustainability
- Issue 95